Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
This matter was remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, to allow the defendant to state his reasons for moving to withdraw his guilty plea. Upon remittitur, the defendant asserted, contrary to statements he made at the plea allocution, that he was innocent and that he was dissatisfied with the services of his plea counsel. We find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to vacate his plea (see, People v. Pettway, 140 A.D.2d 721; People v. Abdulla, 134 A.D.2d 433; People v. Baldwin, 130 A.D.2d 497). Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.