AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PHILIP CHEEKS, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.

The evidence adduced at trial was legally insufficient to establish that the complainant suffered "physical impairment" (People v. McDowell, 28 N.Y.2d 373, 375), or "substantial pain" (Matter of Phillip A., 49 N.Y.2d 198, 200). General undeveloped assertions that a victim felt pain when hit does not establish "physical injury" (see, Penal Law § 10.00; People v Holden, 148 A.D.2d 635; People v. Williams, 101 A.D.2d 870). Here, the complainant testified that he experienced pain when the defendant hit him twice over the head with a gun. However, he did not indicate the duration or degree of pain. He also testified that he did not seek medical assistance or treatment. The only other testimony adduced relative to his injury was an officer's observation of a "small abrasion" on the complainant's head. Thus, the witnesses never elaborated on the duration or degree of the pain, nor provided some other objective indicia of "substantial pain" to properly sustain a charge of assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00). Kunzeman, J.P., Rubin, Eiber and Miller, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. CHEEKS
(May 14, 1990)