Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

FORREST ROBERT NENNINGER, A MINOR, BY HIS NEXT FRIEND, NANCY JEAN KIEVIT, AND NANCY JEAN KIEVIT, INDIVIDUALLY, RESPONDENTS, v. ANTHONY ROBERT NENNINGER, APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM:

Pro se defendant and putative father in paternity case appeals trial court's pendente lite order awarding custody of 16-month old child to mother.

We hold that the trial court's pendente lite custody order was not a final judgment. It was therefore not appealable. Section 512.020, RSMo 1986.

Pendente lite orders awarding child support, maintenance and attorneys' fees in dissolution cases have been held to be appealable final judgments, see Bradley v. Bradley, 295 S.W.2d 592, 595 (Mo.App. 1956), on the rationale of State ex rel. Gercke v. Seddon, 93 Mo. 520, 6 S.W. 342, 343 (1887). See also, Richardson v. Richardson, 524 S.W.2d 149, 153 (Mo.App. 1975). Temporary child custody awards, on the other hand, are held to be not final for purposes of appeal. Haldeman v. Haldeman, 685 S.W.2d 570, 571-72 (Mo.App. 1984); Femmer v. Femmer, 669 S.W.2d 63 (Mo.App. 1984); Dorris v. Dorris, 623 S.W.2d 47, 48 (Mo.App. 1981); Raines v. Raines, 590 S.W.2d 117, 118 (Mo.App. 1979); Raines v. Raines, 567 S.W.2d 459, 460 (Mo.App. 1978); Lipschitz v. Smith, 459 S.W.2d 17, 18 (Mo.App. 1970).

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NENNINGER v. NENNINGER
(Jun 19, 1990)