AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

DOUGLAS H. CASEMENT et al., Appellants, v. TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the plaintiffs lack standing (see, Matter of Sun-Brite Car Wash v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 69 N.Y.2d 406, 413; Matter of Dairylea Coop. v. Walkley, 38 N.Y.2d 6, 9), and that the action is barred by the four-month Statute of Limitations set forth in CPLR 217 (see, Press v County of Monroe, 50 N.Y.2d 695; Solnick v. Whalen, 49 N.Y.2d 224; International Paper Co. v. Sterling Forest Pollution Control Corp., 105 A.D.2d 278; cf., Stettine v. County of Suffolk, 105 A.D.2d 109).

In view of our determination the plaintiffs' remaining contentions are rendered academic. Thompson, J.P., Rubin, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CASEMENT v. TOWN OF POUGHKEEPSIE
(Jun 25, 1990)