PER CURIAM.
The state concedes, and we agree, that it was error for the trial court to enter judgments of conviction for both driving under the influence (Count I) and driving with an unlawful blood alcohol level (Count II). See State v. Rolle, 560 So.2d 1154 (Fla. 1990). We find no other reversible error by the trial court. Accordingly, we reverse the conviction for Count II and remand with directions that such conviction be vacated, and affirm in all other respects.
ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and POLEN, JJ., concur.