AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of MIQUEL MERCEDES, Appellant, v. DANIEL A. SENKOWSKI, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

Mahoney, P.J.

Petitioner was confined at Clinton Correctional Facility in Clinton County and charged with the use of a controlled substance in violation of State-wide rule 113.12 (see, 7 N.Y.CRR former 270.1 [b] [14] [iv]). He was found guilty following a disciplinary hearing and was unsuccessful on administrative appeal. He commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the determination. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal followed.

Petitioner claims that the determination should be annulled because EMIT control test result cards were not produced in violation of 7 NYCRR 1020.4 (e) (1) (iv) and 1020.5 (a) (1). Petitioner's failure to raise this issue at the administrative level precludes its consideration now (see, e.g., Matter of Hop Wah v. Coughlin, 153 A.D.2d 999, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 705). In any event, we recently have resolved petitioner's contentions contrary to his position (see, Matter of Sweet v. Coughlin, 161 A.D.2d 1005).

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MERCEDES v. SENKOWSKI
(Jul 12, 1990)