AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN ELLIS, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The contentions of the defendant on this appeal were not raised in the defendant's application to withdraw his plea and hence are not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636). In any event, it was not improper for the court to inform the defendant of the maximum legal sentence that could be imposed if the defendant proceeded to trial and was found guilty (see, People v. Provosty, 141 A.D.2d 867, 868). The defendant's other contentions are similarly without merit (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Eiber, Harwood and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ELLIS
(Jul 30, 1990)