AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEROME SANDY, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

Because the prosecutor at the hearing held in November 1989 was unable to recall his reasons for challenging five black prospective jurors, the People failed to meet their burden of overcoming the presumption of discrimination found by this court (see, People v Jackson, 152 A.D.2d 706; People v Mims, 149 A.D.2d 948; People v Knight, 144 A.D.2d 1020). Brown, J.P., Eiber, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SANDY
(Aug 13, 1990)