Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PENDER v. WITCHER.

CARLEY, Chief Judge.

In Hightower v. Gen. Motors Corp., 175 Ga. App. 112, 113 (1) ( 332 S.E.2d 336) (1985), aff'd on other grounds, 255 Ga. 349 ( 338 S.E.2d 426) (1986), a majority of this court held that it was permissible to impeach the general credibility of an adverse witness in a civil case by proving his first offender record for commission of a felony or a crime of moral turpitude. This whole court decision in Hightower was subsequently followed in Hardman v. Hardman, 185 Ga. App. 519, 520 (4) ( 364 S.E.2d 645) (1988) and Salomon v. Earp, 190 Ga. App. 405, 407 ( 379 S.E.2d 217) (1989) but, in Whidby v. Columbine Carrier, 182 Ga. App. 638 ( 356 S.E.2d 709) (1987), it was not. In the original appearance of the instant case before us, we resolved this conflict by holding that the whole court decision in Hightower should be followed and that the decision in Whidby should be overruled. Pender v. Witcher, 194 Ga. App. 72 (2) ( 389 S.E.2d 560) (1989). On certiorari, however, the Supreme Court reversed, holding that the first offender record of an adverse witness in a civil case "is not admissible for the purpose of impeaching the witness by showing him to have been convicted of [a felony or] a crime involving moral turpitude." Witcher v. Pender, 260 Ga. 248, 249 ( 392 S.E.2d 6) (1990).

Accordingly, our decision in Pender v. Witcher, supra, is hereby vacated and the judgment of the Supreme Court in Witcher v. Pender, supra, is made the judgment of this court. It necessarily follows, therefore, that the decisions of this court in Hightower v. Gen. Motors Corp., supra, Hardman v. Hardman, supra, and Salomon v. Earp, supra, must be overruled to the extent that the holdings thereof are inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Witcher v. Pender, supra, and that the decision of this court in Whidby v. Columbine Carrier, supra, remains viable authority. Because the trial court in the instant case correctly refused to allow appellant-plaintiff to use appellee-defendant's first offender record for general impeachment purposes, the judgment is affirmed. "This decision does not affect the holding of Hightower v. General Motors Corp., 255 Ga. 349 ([supra]), that evidence of a first offender record is admissible in a civil trial to impeach an adverse witness by disproving or contradicting his testimony." Witcher v. Pender, supra at 249.

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., McMurray, P. J., Banke, P. J., Birdsong, Sognier, Pope, Beasley and Cooper, JJ., concur.

CARLEY, Chief Judge.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 12, 1990.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PENDER v. WITCHER
(Sep 12, 1990)