AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of JOHN HUDSON, Appellant, v. ALBANY COUNTY GRAND JURY, Respondent.

Weiss, J.

Petitioner sought a copy of the Grand Jury minutes underlying the indictment upon which he was convicted after trial in 1983 of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree. The conviction was affirmed by this court ( 112 A.D.2d 650, lv denied 66 N.Y.2d 615). Petitioner contends that after personally reviewing the trial evidence he concluded that the evidence before the Grand Jury was insufficient to support the crime charged in the indictment. County Court denied the motion and this appeal ensued.

We affirm. Petitioner's contention fails to make the initial required showing of a compelling and particularized need for access to the Grand Jury minutes (see, Matter of District Attorney of Suffolk County, 58 N.Y.2d 436, 444). In light of the affirmance of petitioner's conviction ( 112 A.D.2d 650, supra), and upon the nonreviewability of a denial of a motion to inspect Grand Jury minutes for sufficiency made under CPL 210.30 where the conviction is based upon legally sufficient trial evidence, petitioner is foreclosed in any current postjudgment challenge relating to the sufficiency of the evidence before the Grand Jury. Accordingly, his alleged need is without basis in fact and his motion was properly denied.

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF HUDSON v. ALBANY COUNTY GRAND JURY
(Sep 27, 1990)