AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

LEWIS LUBITZ et al., Plaintiffs, v. GEORGE MEHLMAN, Respondent; MORRIS FELLNER, Respondent-Appellant, and LOUIS GROSSMAN, as Executor of HARRY GROSSMAN, Deceased, Inter

CPLR 510 (2) provides that the court, upon motion, may change the place of trial of an action where "there is reason to believe that an impartial trial cannot be had in the proper county". It is well settled that the moving party must make a factual showing sufficient to support such a determination (Kenford Co. v. County of Erie, 38 A.D.2d 781), and further, that the judicial discretion of the court will not be disturbed in the absence of a showing that such discretion has been abused (Stavredes v. United Skates, 87 A.D.2d 502).

The IAS court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the appearance of Louis Grossman, formerly an acting Justice of the Supreme Court, New York County, as executor of the estate of his late brother, Harry Grossman, the temporary receiver in the underlying action, did not mandate a change of venue. The IAS court clearly stated the reasons for its denial of the motion.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kupferman, Sullivan and Carro, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LUBITZ v. MEHLMAN
(Oct 9, 1990)