Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: None of defendant's contentions requires reversal. The trial court's limited questioning of the complainant was proper (see, People v. De Jesus, 42 N.Y.2d 519, 523) and the complainant's reference to a prior incident involving the defendant was not so prejudicial that it denied defendant a fair trial or subverted the court's Sandoval ruling (see, People v. Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371). On this record, defendant's convictions for first degree burglary are supported by the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495), defendant received meaningful assistance of counsel (see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 146-147; cf., People v. Dombrowski, 163 A.D.2d 873), and defendant's sentence is not excessive.