Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CHARLES ANDREW HICKMAN AND SAM AND BEA AMIRA SERVICES, INC., APPELLANTS, v. R.A. SACINO, RAYMOND CARAGHER AND MELANIE CARAGHER, AS CO-PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF JASON T. CARAGHER, DECEASED, AND TONY DEAN EVANS, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

Charles A. Hickman and Amira Services, Inc. appeal from two non-final orders denying their motions to dismiss for improper venue or in the alternative, motions to transfer. We affirm. Absent "palpable" abuse or a grossly "improvident" exercise of discretion, a trial court's granting or refusal of a motion for change in venue based on forum non conveniens will not be disturbed. See D.L. Thornton, M.D. v. DeBerry, 548 So.2d 1177 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). We further find that appellants failed to timely assert the ground of joint residency venue privilege. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.140(b) and (h).

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD, DELL and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HICKMAN v. SACINO
(Oct 12, 1990)