Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

FAIRCLOTH et al. v. GREINER et al.

BENHAM, Justice.

Appellants filed this direct appeal from the denial of their motion to set aside a judgment entered against them in an action for damages, and invoked this court's appellate jurisdiction by asserting that the order denying the motion to set aside contained an injunction. Assuming without deciding that the trial court's order denying the motion to set aside the judgment did contain an injunction, appellants' failure to file an application seeking discretionary review of the denial of the motion to set aside requires dismissal of this appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8); Floyd v. Floyd, 250 Ga. 208 ( 296 S.E.2d 607) (1982); Rolleston v. Rolleston, 249 Ga. 208 ( 289 S.E.2d 518) (1982). The motion to assess damages for a frivolous appeal is denied.

Appeal dismissed. Clarke, C. J., Smith, P. J., Bell, Hunt, Benham, Fletcher, JJ., and Judge William M. Fleming, Jr., concur; Weltner, J., not participating.

DECIDED OCTOBER 18, 1990 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED DECEMBER 19, 1990.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FAIRCLOTH v. GREINER
(Oct 18, 1990)