Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

John T. PEAY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On consideration of appellee's petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc, and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division* that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of May 23, 1990, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc on Tuesday, December 11, 1990, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel should be present in the District of Columbia Court of Appeals courtroom, located on the sixth floor, no later than 9:25 a.m. on that day. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before November 5, 1990.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEAY v. U.S
(Oct 25, 1990)