Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

SNOW MOUNTAIN PINE COMPANY, Appellant, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF OREGON and CP National Corporation, Respondents, and OREGON TRAIL ELECTRIC CONSUMERS COOPERATIVE, INC., Inter

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Snow Mountain Pine Company appeals from a decision of the circuit court affirming an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) on remand from this court. Snow Mt. Pine Company v. Maudlin, 84 Or. App. 590, 734 P.2d 1366, rev den 303 Or. 591 (1987). It contends that PUC's decision is inconsistent with our remand instructions or, in the alternative, that our opinion and remand instructions were wrong. We adhere to our opinion and conclude that PUC complied with our instructions on remand.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SNOW MOUNTAIN PINE CO. v. PUC
(Nov 20, 1990)