Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court correctly denied suppression of the inculpatory statements made by the defendant to the police. According much weight to the determination of the hearing court, which had the advantage of having seen and heard the witnesses (see, People v. Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761), we find that the defendant was properly advised of his constitutional rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona ( 384 U.S. 436), which he waived prior to making the statements. We further find that the court properly denied suppression of the inculpatory statements made by the defendant to a fellow inmate while at the Nassau County Correctional Facility since this inmate was not an agent of law enforcement officials (see, People v. Cardona, 41 N.Y.2d 333, 335).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15). The sentence imposed was not excessive.
We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Brown, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.