Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF MEYERLAND COMPANY AND WILLIAM M. ADKINSON, DEBTORS. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS MANAGER OF THE FSLIC RESOLUTION FUND AS RECEIVER FOR CONTINENTAL SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, APPELLANT, v. MEYERLAND COMPANY AND WILLIAM ADKINSON, APPELLEES.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion September 7, 1990, 5 Cir., 1990, 910 F.2d 1257)

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. A majority of the panel enjoined further proceedings in this cause in the state courts of Texas. Because it is necessary in aid of our jurisdiction, we continue that injunction pending the completion of en banc review. 28 U.S.C. § 2283. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MEYERLAND CO
(Dec 27, 1990)