GANTT v. SENTRY INSURANCE, Cal. Ct. App., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Factual and Procedural Background

This opinion compiles references to multiple cases, including Gantt v. Sentry Insurance, Kinlaw v. State of California, Times Mirror Co. v. Superior Court, and others, as part of a tracking mechanism pending review by the Supreme Court. Several cases were transferred between appellate districts, and some reviews were granted or dismissed. The opinion primarily serves to track these cases rather than address a singular dispute or factual scenario.

Legal Issues Presented

The opinion addresses a procedural matter and does not frame distinct legal issues.

Arguments of the Parties

The opinion does not contain a detailed account of the parties' legal arguments.

Table of Precedents Cited

Precedent	Rule or Principle Cited For	Application by the Court
Gantt v. Sentry Insurance	Tracking pending review by the Supreme Court	Reprinted without change in 234 Cal.App.3d 612 to permit tracking.
Kinlaw v. State of California	Reference to Supreme Court opinion	See 54 Cal.3d 326 for Supreme Court opinion.
Times Mirror Co. v. Superior Court	Reference to Supreme Court opinion	See 53 Cal.3d 1325 for Supreme Court opinion.
Brodehl v. Becker	Cause transferred with directions	Transferred to Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District; subsequent opinion not certified for publication.
Monterey County v. Cornejo	Reference to Supreme Court opinion	See 53 Cal.3d 1271 for Supreme Court opinion.
Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation	Reference to Supreme Court opinion	See 53 Cal.3d 987 for Supreme Court opinion.
Woosley v. State of California	Tracking pending review by the Supreme Court	Reprinted without change in 234 Cal.App.3d 647 to permit tracking.
Mikail v. Sauerwald	Review dismissed and cause remanded	Review dismissed on August 29, 1991; cause remanded to Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One.
Gourley v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.	Reference to Supreme Court opinion	See 53 Cal.3d 121 for Supreme Court opinion.
County of San Bernardino v. State of California	Review dismissed and cause remanded	Review dismissed on June 28, 1991; cause remanded to Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Three.
Judah v. State Farm Fire Casualty Co.	Review granted and later dismissed as moot	Review granted April 19, 1990; dismissed as moot May 30, 1991.
Walker v. Superior Court	Reference to Supreme Court opinion	See 53 Cal.3d 257 for Supreme Court opinion.
Kizer v. County of San Mateo	Reference to Supreme Court opinion	See 53 Cal.3d 139 for Supreme Court opinion.
Ford v. Gouin	Tracking pending review by the Supreme Court	Reprinted without change in 234 Cal.App.3d 684 to permit tracking.
Van Meter v. American Motor Sports Assn.	Tracking pending review by the Supreme Court	Reprinted without change in 234 Cal.App.3d 707 to permit tracking.

Court's Reasoning and Analysis

The court's reasoning is primarily procedural, focusing on tracking the status of multiple cases pending Supreme Court review. The opinion references the transfer of causes, dismissal of reviews, and reprinting of opinions without change to facilitate monitoring. No substantive legal analysis or application of law to facts is provided within this text.

Holding and Implications

DISPOSED OF

The decision serves to update the procedural posture of various cases rather than establish new legal precedent or resolve substantive issues. Its direct effect is to inform parties and courts of the current status of the referenced cases pending Supreme Court review. No broader legal implications are discussed.

Show full summary ...

Gantt v. Sentry Insurance, Kinlaw

REVIEWS GRANTED

GANTT v. SENTRY INSURANCE