Insofar as the finding of guilt was not based on any confidential information, petitioner's claims concerning the necessity of assessing the reliability of any such information lack merit (cf., Matter of Nelson v Coughlin, 148 A.D.2d 779). Furthermore, the record reveals no basis for petitioner's contention that the employee assistance he received was inadequate, and in any event petitioner has failed to establish any prejudice resulting from his not having received the revised rule book and the log of cell searches (see, Matter of Serrano v Coughlin, 152 A.D.2d 790). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit.
Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Casey, Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., and Levine, JJ., concur.