Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
We conclude that the Supreme Court did not err in requiring the plaintiff to indemnify the defendant for any future claims arising out of their indebtedness on the former marital residence. This conforms, as the Supreme Court found, with the intent of the parties notwithstanding the plaintiff's present objections to the contrary. Brown, J.P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.