Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

CITY OF ORANGEBURG, Appellant v. Angus F. CARTER, III, Respondent.

Heard April 15, 1990.

Decided Jan. 21, 1991.

GREGORY, Chief Judge:

Respondent was convicted in municipal court of first offense driving under the influence (DUI) under S.C. Code Ann. § 56-5-2930 (Supp. 1989). He was fined $268.00. On appeal, the circuit court reversed the conviction. We reverse.

First, the circuit court held respondent's arrest was illegal because the arresting officer had no probable cause to stop him within city limits. To the contrary, the record indicates the officer observed respondent make an improper left turn within city limits establishing probable cause to stop. See State v. Goodstein, 278 S.C. 125, 292 S.E.2d 791 (1982); State v. Parker, 271 S.C. 159, 245 S.E.2d 904 (1978).

Second, the circuit court held the trial judge's refusal to charge that the City must prove both a mental and physical impairment in order to establish DUI was reversible error. We disagree. The trial judge adequately charged the jury that DUI is established by proof the defendant's ability to drive was materially and appreciably impaired. See Dixon v. Weir Fuel Co., 251 S.C. 74, 160 S.E.2d 194 (1968).

Accordingly, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed and respondent's conviction is reinstated.

Reversed.

HARWELL, CHANDLER, FINNEY and TOAL, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CITY OF ORANGEBURG v. CARTER
(Jan 21, 1991)