Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Gerald A. Malia, Ragan Mason, Washington, D.C., argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were John E. Vargo and Michael F. DiCroce. Also on the brief was Robert S. Zuckerman, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Sea-Land Services, Inc., Iselin, N.J., of counsel. Barbara M. Epstein, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, International Trade Field Office.
Judges
  • Giles Sutherland Rich
  • Haldane Robert Mayer
  • Randall Ray Rader
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Gerald A. Malia, Ragan Mason, Washington, D.C., argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were John E. Vargo and Michael F. DiCroce. Also on the brief was Robert S. Zuckerman, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Sea-Land Services, Inc., Iselin, N.J., of counsel. Barbara M. Epstein, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, New York City, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, International Trade Field Office.
Judges
  • Giles Sutherland Rich
  • Haldane Robert Mayer
  • Randall Ray Rader
See more information ...
Smart Summary

SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Sea-Land Service, Inc. appeals the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade granting the United States' motion to sever and dismiss 73 of Sea-Land's entries. The court held that Sea-Land did not timely commence suit challenging the United States Customs Service's denial of its protests over the amount of duty assessed on the entries. See Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. United States, 735 F. Supp. 1059 (Ct. Int'l Trade 1990). We affirm on the basis of the court's opinion, which we adopt.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

SEA-LAND SERVICE, INC., v. UNITED STATES
(Jan 29, 1991)