AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THOMAS B. RUSH et al., Respondents, v. RICHARD INSOGNA, Appellant.

Supreme Court properly denied defendant's motion to settle the record on appeal based on an incomplete trial transcript. In the absence of a stipulation by the parties to the contrary, the court was required under CPLR 5525 to settle only a complete trial transcript (CPLR 5525 [b], [c]; see, Perry v Tauro, 21 A.D.2d 804; see also, McLaughlin v United Airlines, 76 A.D.2d 982). Here, plaintiffs did not consent to only a portion of the record being transcribed and, even if the court had the power to permit omission of part of the transcript without plaintiffs' consent, it would be inappropriate in this case insofar as the parties disagree as to which portions of the transcript are relevant to this appeal.

Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Weiss, Yesawich, Jr., Crew III and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUSH v. INSOGNA
(Feb 7, 1991)