AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. DANA DAVIS, Respondent.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

On this appeal, heard together with the People's appeals in People v. Oquendo ( 172 A.D.2d 566 [decided herewith]) and People v. Evans ( 172 A.D.2d 557 [decided herewith]), the People challenge the dismissal of an indictment on the ground that the defendant was deprived of her right to appear before the Grand Jury. As in People v. Oquendo (supra) and People v. Evans (supra), the defendant requested an opportunity to appear before the Grand Jury and was given a date on which to present herself, but her desire to appear before the Grand Jury was frustrated through actions of the Department of Correction, which returned her to the correctional facility without first allowing her to testify before the Grand Jury. The prosecutor presented the matter for a vote by the Grand Jury notwithstanding the defendant's non-appearance.

For the reasons stated in People v. Oquendo (supra), we conclude that the court properly dismissed the indictment. Bracken, J.P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DAVIS
(Apr 1, 1991)