The record supports County Court's findings that defendant voluntarily made a statement after he was given his Miranda warnings, did not request to speak to an attorney and was not promised anything by the detectives. Any conflict in the testimony given at the suppression hearing merely presented a credibility question for County Court to resolve (see, People v Munhall, 92 A.D.2d 1060, 1061) and its determination will only be rejected on appeal if unsupported as a matter of law (see, People v. Jackson, 101 A.D.2d 955, 955-956). In addition, we see no reason to disturb defendant's prison sentence of 9 to 18 years. He entered into a plea agreement knowing that he would receive the sentence ultimately imposed by County Court and a pending charge of violation of probation was dismissed (see, People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816, 817).
Judgment affirmed. Casey, J.P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur.