AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STEPHEN DE CONTO, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgments are reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. The facts have been considered and are determined to have been established.

After the prosecutor indicated to the court that he had completed his peremptory challenges, and while defense counsel was exercising his peremptory challenges, the court permitted the prosecutor to exercise another peremptory challenge. This constituted reversible error (see, CPL 270.15; People v McQuade, 110 N.Y. 284; People v. Williams, 26 N.Y.2d 62, 63-64; People v. Walker, 168 A.D.2d 470; People v. McBride, 51 A.D.2d 554, 555).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P.J., Kunzeman, Eiber and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DE CONTO
(Apr 15, 1991)