STATE v. MAURE, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Riaz A. Mian argued the cause for appellant David Maure ( Voorhees, Bennett Wherry, attorneys
Riaz A. Mian
E. John Wherry, Jr., on the brief). Carl L. Taraschi argued the cause for appellant Harold
Stephen H. Monson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Riaz A. Mian argued the cause for appellant David Maure ( Voorhees, Bennett Wherry, attorneys
Riaz A. Mian
E. John Wherry, Jr., on the brief). Carl L. Taraschi argued the cause for appellant Harold
Stephen H. Monson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DAVID MAURE,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Baime's opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 240 N.J. Super. 269, 573 A.2d 186 (1990).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.

Opposed — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

STATE v. MAURE

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DAVID MAURE,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

Comments