PENROD v. SCIOTO CTY. PROS. ATTY

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 90-999

Attorney(S)

Charles E. Smith
James Scott Smith, for
Lynn A. Grimshaw, prosecuting attorney,
R. Randolph Rumble, for
David L. Landefeld, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 90-999

Attorney(S)

Charles E. Smith
James Scott Smith, for
Lynn A. Grimshaw, prosecuting attorney,
R. Randolph Rumble, for
David L. Landefeld, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

PENROD, APPELLEE, v. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF SCIOTO COUNTY, APPELLANT.

Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed.

The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.

MOYER, C.J., dissents.

MOYER, C.J., dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in that court's opinion rendered on April 3, 1990.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.