Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

QUANTUM ELECTRIC, INC., APPELLEE, v. CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT, INC., A MISSOURI CORPORATION, AND FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE CO., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the briefs and the recommendation of the Appellate Division of the District Court and upon a de novo review of the record, we find that a reasonable controversy existed as to the plaintiff's right to recover or the amount of such recovery, and therefore the claim was unliquidated. The district court erred in awarding prejudgment interest, and its judgment is ordered modified to exclude the award of prejudgment interest. The judgment of the district court, as modified, is affirmed.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

QUANTUM ELEC., INC. v. CONCEPT DEV., INC
(Apr 25, 1991)