Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BARRY B. KEMPSON, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR MARY A. BLOOMER, PETITIONER-APPELLEE v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT

Appeal and Error 551 (NCI4th) — evenly divided Court — decision affirmed without precedential value Where one member of the Supreme Court did not participate in the consideration or decision of a case and the remaining six justices are equally divided, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value.

Am Jur 2d, Appeal and Error 902.

PER CURIAM.

Justice Martin recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm, and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Bruce v. Memorial Mission Hospital, 325 N.C. 541, 385 S.E.2d 144 (1989); Hochheiser v. N.C. Dept. of Transportation, 321 N.C. 117, 361 S.E.2d 562 (1987); Shields v. Bobby Murray Chevrolet, 300 N.C. 366, 266 S.E.2d 658 (1980); State v. Johnson, 286 N.C. 331, 210 S.E.2d 260 (1974).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KEMPSON v. N.C. DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES
(May 1, 1991)