Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that reversal of his conviction is required because the trial court failed to impose a sanction for the People's violation of People v Rosario ( 9 N.Y.2d 286) is unpreserved for this court's review, as the defendant neither objected thereto nor requested sanctions as a remedy (see, CPL 470.05; People v Best, 145 A.D.2d 499; see also, People v Mathews, 173 A.D.2d 565 [decided herewith]).
We have considered the defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Thompson, J.P., Brown, Eiber and O'Brien, JJ., concur.