CRESPO v. STAPF, N.J. Super. App. Div., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

John C. Kennedy argued the cause for intervenors-appellants Jack S. Piermont and Lerner and Piermont, Esqs. (O'Donnell, Kennedy, Vespole Piechta, attorneys; John C. Kennedy, of counsel and on the brief). George J. Kenny argued the cause for defendants-respondents Josef Stapf and Josef Stapf Maschinenbeau (Connell, Foley Geiser, attorneys; George J. Kenny, of counsel; George J. Kenny and Angela A. Iuso, on the brief). No appearance was made on behalf of plaintiff-appellant Nelson Crespo.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

NELSON CRESPO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEF STAPF, JOSEF STAPF MASCHINENBEAU, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND SCHACHNE FEATHER COMPANY, HUDSON FEATHER COMPANY, HUDSON FEATHER AND DOWN PRODUCTS, INC., PURO DOWN INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY CORP., PURO INTERNATIONAL OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS. JACK S. PIERMONT AND LERNER AND PIERMONT, ESQS., INTERVENORS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment of the Law Division entered in favor of defendants Josef Stapf and Josef Stapf Maschinenbeau dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Nelson Crespo in this product liability action substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Wefing in her written opinion which is reported as Crespo v. Stapf, 242 N.J. Super. 254 , 576 A.2d 346 (Law Div. 1990). We are satisfied from our study of the record and the arguments presented that the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendants and that all of the issues of law raised are clearly without merit. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E). See also Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd., 900 F.2d 686 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 111 S.Ct. 246, 112 L.Ed.2d 204 (1990).

Affirmed.

CRESPO v. STAPF

Comments