AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

PIONEER GROUP et al., Petitioners, v. STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, on Complaint of MILTON W. FOOTE, Respondent.

Determination unanimously modified on the law and as modified confirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: We find that there was substantial evidence supporting the State Division of Human Rights' (SDHR) determination that petitioners unlawfully discriminated against complainant because he had been convicted of a crime (see, Executive Law § 296; Correction Law § 752; see also, State Div. of Human Rights v Sorrento Cheese Co., 115 A.D.2d 323).

However, the order of SDHR must be modified to state that the award of back pay should be offset by any unemployment insurance benefits and employment-related income received by complainant during the period between his unlawful termination and the date on which he accepts or rejects petitioner Pioneer Group's offer of employment (see, Matter of Cosmos Forms v State Div. of Human Rights, 150 A.D.2d 442). In addition, the award to complainant for mental anguish, although supported by his testimony that he was depressed and had difficulty in eating and sleeping for a year after his termination, is reduced to $5,000 as the $10,000 awarded by SDHR was clearly excessive (see, Matter of New York City Tr. Auth. v State Div. of Human Rights, 160 A.D.2d 874, as amended and lv denied Oct. 15, 1990; Matter of Cosmos Forms v State Div. of Human Rights, supra; Matter of Board of Educ. v State Div. of Human Rights, 109 A.D.2d 988; see also, Matter of Almeter v State Div. of Human Rights, 133 A.D.2d 530), and the order of SDHR is modified accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PIONEER GROUP v. STATE DIV. OF HUMAN RIGHTS
(Jun 7, 1991)