AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

CITY OF BATAVIA, Respondent, v. LEO J. BOLAS et al., Appellants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The trial court properly determined that the measure of damages in this partial taking case was "the difference between the value of the whole before the taking and the value of the remainder after the taking" (Diocese of Buffalo v State of New York, 24 N.Y.2d 320, 323). We affirm the trial court's award inasmuch as it is within the range of the conflicting expert opinion testimony and is not affected by legal error (see, Matter of Village of Hilton v Edelman, 83 A.D.2d 767; City of Buffalo v Goldman, 63 A.D.2d 828, 829). The city's appraisal complied with the requirements established by the Uniform Rules for Trial Courts (22 N.Y.CRR part 202) and was not based upon the method of valuation held to be invalid by the Court of Appeals in Latham Holding Co. v State of New York ( 16 N.Y.2d 41).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CITY OF BATAVIA v. BOLAS
(Jun 7, 1991)