Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the determination is confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.
Medicaid providers who are denied re-enrollment pursuant to 18 NYCRR part 504 are not entitled to an evidentiary hearing pursuant to 18 N.Y.CRR part 515 (see, Matter of Akhatr v Perales, 173 A.D.2d 539; Matter of G S Pharmacy v Perales, 151 A.D.2d 668; Matter of Garcia v Perales, 168 A.D.2d 557; Matter of Winyard v Perales, 161 A.D.2d 317; Matter of Bezar v New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 151 A.D.2d 44). Thus, the failure to provide the petitioner with a hearing did not deprive her of due process of law.
Moreover, we find that the determination denying the petitioner's application for re-enrollment was neither arbitrary nor capricious. Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, O'Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.