AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

KAROUZIN MARDIROS, Respondent, v. NABIL GHALY et al., Appellants. (Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in finding that plaintiff's responses to designated items in defendants' demand for a bill of particulars were sufficient. The court's order denying defendants' motion for reargument is not appealable (see, Fahey v County of Nassau, 111 A.D.2d 214).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARDIROS v. GHALY
(Jul 12, 1991)