AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

PENEPENT CORPORATION et al., Respondents, v. RICHARD S. PENEPENT, JR., et al., Appellants, and RICHARD S. PENEPENT, SR., et al., Respondents. (Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants leave to serve a second amended answer, but abused its discretion in imposing sanctions, costs, disbursements and attorney's fees as a condition (see, Menne Nursery Corp. v Rebco Steel Corp., 73 A.D.2d 1059). The proposed pleading will not cause plaintiffs significant prejudice or expense and was interposed within a reasonable time upon the advice of substituted counsel. The court properly denied, without prejudice, plaintiffs' motion to dismiss affirmative defenses and counterclaims.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PENEPENT CORPORATION v. PENEPENT
(Jul 12, 1991)