AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD D. JORDAN, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Oneida County Court for resentencing, in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant's conviction for assault in the first degree was not repugnant to his acquittal of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Viewing the elements of each offense, as charged by the court (see, People v Loughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 804; People v Green, 71 N.Y.2d 1006; People v Tucker, 55 N.Y.2d 1, rearg denied 55 N.Y.2d 1039), the jury could have found that defendant's initial possession of the knife was without the intent to use the knife unlawfully against the victim (see, People v Garcia, 72 A.D.2d 356, 361, affd 52 N.Y.2d 716; People v Hudson, 163 A.D.2d 418, 419). The court's charge, to which defendant had no objection, defined each charge separately and required that the jury consider them separately. If, as defendant now claims, he could not have committed assault in the first degree without by the same conduct committing criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, defendant should have asked the court to submit these counts in the alternative. The court's charge, unobjected to by the defendant, permitted the verdict returned here (see, People v Olcan, 143 A.D.2d 369, 373, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 1048).

Reviewing this record in light of the factors enunciated by the Court of Appeals in People v Taranovich ( 37 N.Y.2d 442), we reject defendant's argument that the 14-month delay from arrest to trial deprived him of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. We do conclude, however, that the defendant was improperly sentenced as a second felony offender based upon a 1984 Florida conviction for grand theft. The Florida statute in effect at the time made it a felony to steal property with a value greater than $100, whereas the New York threshold for a felony was $250. Consequently, defendant's 1984 Florida conviction is not a predicate felony for sentencing purposes (see, People v Olah, 300 N.Y. 96; People v Rodgers, 128 A.D.2d 418, lv denied 70 N.Y.2d 655; People v Brooks, 73 A.D.2d 564). Accordingly, defendant's adjudication as a second felony offender must be vacated and the matter remitted for resentencing.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. JORDAN
(Jul 12, 1991)