AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAFAEL ALESANDRE, Also Known as JIMMY, Appellant.

Mahoney, P.J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to five reduced charges of second degree criminal sale of a controlled substance. This plea was in full satisfaction of five separate indictments charging him with first degree criminal sale of a controlled substance and an unindicted charge of assault stemming from an incident while defendant was in jail. Defendant was subsequently sentenced to five concurrent prison terms of nine years to life. Defendant now appeals.

Defendant initially argues that he was denied due process by County Court's failure to order a hearing to determine his mental competence. Such a hearing, however, must be premised on an objective determination by the court that a reasonable ground exists to doubt defendant's competence (see, People v Gensler, 72 N.Y.2d 239, 245, cert denied 488 U.S. 932; People v Armlin, 37 N.Y.2d 167, 168). Here, both the plea colloquy and sentencing minutes fail to proffer any objective indication that County Court erred in not ordering a hearing. We note further that, between the entering of his guilty plea and sentencing, defendant was sent to a psychiatric center by authorities at the County Jail, apparently in response to a perceived suicide risk. Defendant was released therefrom and, at the time of sentencing, the court took notice of a psychiatric report rendered on defendant's discharge which stated that defendant was alert, fully oriented, cooperative and exhibiting "no psychotic thinking". Accordingly, we find no basis to disturb the court's ruling in this regard (see, People v Carbone, 159 A.D.2d 511, lv denied, 76 N.Y.2d 732).

We have examined defendant's remaining contentions and find all to lack merit. As noted in the People's brief on appeal, however, defendant was erroneously sentenced on his conviction for class A-II felonies (Penal Law § 220.41) to a minimum term of imprisonment of nine years despite the statutory ceiling therefor of eight years and four months (Penal Law § 70.00 [a] [ii]). The sentence should therefore be reduced (see, People v Selikoff, 35 N.Y.2d 227, 238, cert denied 419 U.S. 1122; People v Gustafson, 101 A.D.2d 920). Although we generally remit cases where a plea is entered in return for a bargained-for sentence later revealed as unlawful (see, People v West, 80 A.D.2d 680, 681), in this instance we choose to correct the sentence in accordance with the lawful minimum (see, CPL 470.15 [c]).

Yesawich Jr., Levine, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the sentence imposed to five concurrent prison terms of 8 1/3 years to life, and, as so modified, affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ALESANDRE
(Jul 18, 1991)