Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of the Marriage of Vonetta Ruth BURNS, Respondent, and Russell Lee BURNS, Appellant.

PER CURIAM

Husband petitions for review of our opinion. 107 Or. App. 167, 811 P.2d 654 (1991). We treat the petition as a petition for reconsideration and allow it. ORAP 9.15.

Husband contends that this portion of our opinion is inappropriate with respect to prejudgment interest:

"A money judgment against husband in the amount of $12,500, plus interest at a rate of 9 percent per annum from date of trial, to be paid in full before June 8, 1997, with monthly installments of a minimum of $285 beginning on June 8, 1992." 107 Or App at 171.

We agree. The opinion is modified, as husband requests, to allow interest only from the date of the entry of the trial court judgment. We delete the quoted language and substitute the following:

"A money judgment against husband in the amount of $12,500, plus interest at a rate of 9 percent per annum from the date of the entry of the trial court judgment, to be paid in full before May 11, 1997, with monthly installments of a minimum of $285 beginning on May 11, 1992."

Petition for reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BURNS AND BURNS
(Jul 17, 1991)