Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. PAUL ROSS, Appellant.

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted on his plea of guilty to theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. He challenges the part of his sentence relating to the amount of restitution imposed and the joint and several nature of his liability for that amount. The state concedes that the record provides insufficient data from which to determine the proper amount of restitution, but it argues that joint and several liability is proper.

We affirm the decision without deciding either issue. Defendant pled guilty. His right to appeal is provided by ORS 138.050, which limits the issues that we may review to whether the disposition exceeds the maximum allowable by law or is cruel and unusual. There is no statutory limit on the amount of restitution that may be imposed, and defendant does not argue that his sentence is cruel and unusual. We are without authority to review the issues that defendant raises. State v. King, 107 Or. App. 249, 810 P.2d 413 (1991).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. ROSS
(Aug 28, 1991)