Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DALE EDWARD BURNS, Appellant. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent,

PER CURIAM

Defendants have petitioned for review of our decision. 107 Or. App. 380, 812 P.2d 837 (1991). We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, and allow it. For reasons explained in State v. Morrison/Bartee, 108 Or. App. 766, 816 P.2d 1217 (1991), we modify our decision, vacate defendants' convictions and remand for further proceedings as directed in State v. Morrison/Bartee, supra.

In our per curiam opinion, we said:

"The facts of this case are set out in State v. Morrison/Bartee, 107 Or. App. 343, 812 P.2d 832 (1991), and the law and the result are the same." 107 Or App at 381.

Petition for reconsideration allowed; opinion modified; convictions vacated; remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. BURNS/KENNEY
(Sep 11, 1991)