Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

George Bedford HOLLINGSWORTH, et al., Petitioners, v. Pete KING, et al., Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

George and May Hollingsworth sued Pete and Bonnie King for negligently failing to restrain a horse from wandering onto a public highway. The trial court granted summary judgment for the Kings, which the court of appeals reversed 810 S.W.2d 772. The Hollingsworths have nevertheless applied to this Court for writ of error. Their sole contention in this Court is that the court of appeals erred in holding that there is no common law duty to restrain livestock. We express no opinion on this contention and deny the application. In so doing, however, we should not be taken as approving any other part of the court of appeals' opinion.Copyright (c) West Group 1998 No claim to original U.S. Govt. works

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Hollingsworth v. King
(Oct 2, 1991)