AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

DORIS MICHELA et al., Appellants, v. COUNTY OF NASSAU, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On appeal, the plaintiffs raise the same issues and makes the same allegations against the County of Nassau as they did in their related appeal in which the Village of Lynbrook was the respondent (see, Michela v. County of Nassau, 176 A.D.2d 707 [decided herewith]). The plaintiff's contentions are without merit for the reasons stated by this court in affirming the order dated December 1, 1989, which granted summary judgment to the Village of Lynbrook in this action (see, Michela v. County of Nassau, supra). Mangano, P.J., Kunzeman, Miller and Copertino, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MICHELA v. COUNTY OF NASSAU
(Oct 7, 1991)