AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JAMES OAKES, Respondent, v. NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and cross motion granted. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiff's motion and denying defendants' cross motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's Labor Law § 240 (1) claim. Plaintiff was injured while he was helping to guide a 45-foot metal bar with a tag line that was wrapped around his hand. At that time, the tag line became wedged in a gap in the hand rail and tightened around plaintiff's hand, causing severe injuries. Because plaintiff's injury was not the result of a fall from a height or a falling object, his Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action must be dismissed (see, Shaffer v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 167 A.D.2d 824, 825, appeal dismissed 77 N.Y.2d 835; see also, Root v County of Onondaga, 174 A.D.2d 1014; Staples v Town of Amherst, 146 A.D.2d 292).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OAKES v. NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION
(Oct 4, 1991)