CHRYSLER MOTORS CORP. v. U.S

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 91-1190.

Attorney(S)

Joseph S. Kaplan, Ross Hardies, New York City, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Michelle F. Forte, of counsel. Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, of New York, New York City, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen. and David M. Cohen, Director. Also on the brief was Edward N. Maurer, U.S. Customs Service, of counsel. Barton C. Green, Sr. Vice President, Gen. Counsel, Secretary Treasurer, American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington, D.C., represented amicus curiae, American Iron and Steel Institute. Alexander W. Sierck, Beveridge Diamond, P.C., Washington, D.C., represented amicus curiae, Automotive Parts and Accessories Ass'n and American Iron and Steel Institute.

Judges

Pauline Newman

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 91-1190.

Attorney(S)

Joseph S. Kaplan, Ross Hardies, New York City, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Michelle F. Forte, of counsel. Joseph I. Liebman, Atty. in Charge, Intern. Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, of New York, New York City, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen. and David M. Cohen, Director. Also on the brief was Edward N. Maurer, U.S. Customs Service, of counsel. Barton C. Green, Sr. Vice President, Gen. Counsel, Secretary Treasurer, American Iron and Steel Institute, Washington, D.C., represented amicus curiae, American Iron and Steel Institute. Alexander W. Sierck, Beveridge Diamond, P.C., Washington, D.C., represented amicus curiae, Automotive Parts and Accessories Ass'n and American Iron and Steel Institute.

Judges

Pauline Newman

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Chrysler Motors Corporation appeals the decision of the Court of International Trade denying drawback for duty paid on certain merchandise transferred by Chrysler to a foreign-trade zone, the court holding that the merchandise is not considered exported on the facts that pertain. On the opinion of the Court of International Trade, which we adopt, the decision is

Chrysler Motors Corporation v. United States, 755 F. Supp. 388 (Ct.Int'l Trade 1990).

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.

Comments