AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

CENTRAL FEDERAL SAVINGS, FSB, Respondent, v. RUTH BANCHIK, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff Central Federal established its entitlement to a preliminary injunction, enjoining defendant Ruth Banchik from transferring any funds deposited by her with defendants National Westminster Bank and Dime Savings Bank of New York, during the pendency of the underlying action by plaintiff, seeking to impress a trust upon the aforementioned funds (Grant Co. v Srogi, 52 N.Y.2d 496).

Specifically, the likelihood of plaintiff's success on the merits was established by, inter alia, the July 7, 1988, letter agreement between the parties requiring $200,000 as substitute collateral for the mortgage on certain real property owned by defendant Banchik's husband, and by the $200,000 bank check deposited with plaintiff Central Federal on the same date.

Defendant Banchik's failure to timely raise an objection to the alleged improper venue constituted a waiver of that relief as a matter of right (Callanan Indus. v. Sovereign Constr. Co., 44 A.D.2d 292).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CENTRAL FEDERAL SAVINGS, FSB v. BANCHIK
(Oct 3, 1991)