MARLOWE v. RUSH-HENRIETTA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, N.Y., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

George A. Schell for
James E. Maslyn for Rush-Henrietta Central School District,
David F. Bowen, Robert M. Shaddock
Roger G. Preston, Jr., for Derrick Nesmith,

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

George A. Schell for
James E. Maslyn for Rush-Henrietta Central School District,
David F. Bowen, Robert M. Shaddock
Roger G. Preston, Jr., for Derrick Nesmith,

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

STEVEN M. MARLOWE, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, STEVEN L. MARLOWE, et al., Appellants, v. RUSH-HENRIETTA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 167 A.D.2d 820).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges SIMONS, KAYE, TITONE, HANCOCK, JR., and BELLACOSA. Judge ALEXANDER dissents and votes to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 167 A.D.2d 820, 820-822).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

MARLOWE v. RUSH-HENRIETTA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

STEVEN M. MARLOWE, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, STEVEN L. MARLOWE, et al., Appellants, v. RUSH-HENRIETTA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Respondents.

Comments