PER CURIAM.
In this difficult child custody dispute between two capable parents, the trial judge heard conflicting testimony and determined that the interests of the children were best served by a change of custody to the father. Based on the evidence presented, we are unable to say that such determination constitutes an abuse of discretion. We therefore affirm. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1980).
DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.